Peter Singer on Equality - 638 Words

In recent years a lot of suppressed groups have worked in an organized and active way towards one particular goal: equality. The typical example is the Black Liberation movement, which insisted on putting an end to the prejudice and discrimination that has made them inferior to other people. The instant call of the black liberation movement and its success became an ideal for other oppressed groups to go after. During the time other movements started to develop, putting the focus on such issues as gay, women’s and African-American rights. Peter Singer gave a start to animal rights movement, paying particular attention to how in former time â€Å"permissible† types of discrimination and prejudice came to be seen as unjustly and dishonestly bias towards specific set of people and that the hour has come for a much the same dedication to the moral and legal entitlement of species that walk on four legs instead of two. Singer starts his argument by supposing that the ‘principle of equality’ or ‘principle of equal consideration of interests’ is a basic moral principle, which implies treating the interests of all people as equally significant in spite of gender, color, or sexual orientation. Then he puts forward the idea that we should ‘reinterpret’ the theory of equality so that it relate not only just to all human being but also to all sentient beings, by which he refers to all beings that have the ability to suffer or enjoy happiness. Suffering is immoral, so we should stopShow MoreRelatedEssay on ANIMAL RIGHTS790 Words   |  4 Pagesundeserving of rights. Also I will be using â€Å"Animal Liberation† by Peter Singer. This book shows many aspects; that all animals are equal is the first argument or why the ethical principle on which human equality rests requires us to extend equal consideration to animals too. The biocentric worldview, which is life centered, focuses on the importance of all living things and considers all living things to have intrinsic value. I will be using Peter Singer’s ideas as the main focus explaining that animalsRead MoreEqually Consider This1419 Words   |  6 PagesIn Peter Singer’s All Animals are Equal, he presents an argument for equal consideration for members of nonhuman species, otherwise known as animals. In this paper, I will argue that Singer’s argument does not prove that animals are deserving of equal consideration because it contains a premise that is not obviously true. The premise I believe to be inadequately supported is the premise that there is no property that all human sentient creatures have that not all sentient creatures have that wouldRead MoreEthical Issue Of Animal Testing For Medical Research961 Words   |  4 Pagessome wrote on the lack of inherent rights. This issue is difficult because animals can’t spe ak for themselves but humans do have a place to play in the fight for animal rights. I will apply the principle of utility along with the moral theories of equality and speciesism in order show that animal testing for medical research is not an ethical practice. Principle of Utility Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that argues that all people should act in ways that bring about as much happiness as possibleRead MoreThe Doctrine Of Utilitarianism Essays883 Words   |  4 Pagesis moral. Singer had many arguments when it comes to animal rights and speciesism. Singer defines ‘speciesists’ as individuals who â€Å"give greater weight to the interests of members of their own species when there is a clash between their interests and the interests of those of other species. Human speciesists do not accept that pain is as bad when it is felt by pigs or mice as when it is felt by humans† (Singer Equality). Singer’s main point when explaining animal rights is that equality does notRead MoreEssay on Peter Singers Views on the Killing of Animals1295 Words   |  6 Pagesthings. Peter Singer seems to agree with these people. He thinks animals are aware of their feelings and what is happening to them. Singer feels that there should be some equality between humans and animals. He says that every being has the ability to suffer which is what makes hurting animals wrong. Singer says, If a being suffers, there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering into consideration. No matter what the nature of the being, the principle of equality requiresRead MoreEqual Rights for Animals in Peter Singer’s Article, All Animals are Equal652 Words   |  3 Pages In Peter Singer’s article, All Animals are Equal, Singer claims that animals deserve the same equal rights and respect that the human lives get. His strongest argument is defined by all animals, human or non-human shall be defined as equal. Singer makes some very strong arguments within his article, but I feel some of his statements are humanist. As an animal lover and mother to two pets, I disagree that not all animals or living things endure the same amount. However, I do agree that animalsRead MoreExplain the distinction Jean Grimshaw makes between misogyny and philosophically significant ‘maleness’ of philosophical theories.999 Words   |  4 Pagestheories. 2. What reasons does Peter Singer give for his view that ‘differences between humans and animals’ are irrelevant to considerations of the moral ‘equality for animals’? Peter Singer explores the moral considerations when taking into account the equality of nonhumans. The fundamental principle of equality is that the interests of all individuals are of equal value, no matter who the individuals are. In this case, Singer is discussing nonhuman equality. Singer argues that if a being suffersRead MoreArgument Against Animal Experimentation : Peter Singer And Tom Regan1035 Words   |  5 Pagescontinued to experiment on animals to test the effects of products such as makeup. Both Peter Singer and Tom Regan would have strong opinions against this experimentation, but they would also have different ways of expressing their view on the topic. They have expressed that animals should be considered to a certain extent that humans and other animals should be treated with some form of equality. While Peter Singer and Tom Regan would have similar goals in this situation, there are many parts of theirRead MoreThe Reading I Chose Is Animal Liberation, By Peter Singer828 Words   |  4 PagesThe reading I chose is Animal Liberation, by Peter Singer. Peter Singer argues against animals cruelty, discrimination, and animals equal rights. Singer uses philosophy to teach and educate others on his point of view. Singer points out that animals have rights too and supports animals just like he does with Black Liberation, Gay Liberation, and Women Liberation. Singer states, â€Å"It is a demand for a complete change in our attitudes to nonhumans. It is a demand that we cease to regard the exploitationRead MoreAnimal Rights Vs Peter Singer825 Words   |  4 PagesHearne, animal trainer and author of What’s Wrong with Animal Rights, and Peter Singer, author of The Animal Liberation Movement, relate humans to other living beings. Although, both Hearne and Singer share some similarities towards animal rights their perspective towards animal suffering differ in definitions and qualities of suffering. Hearne and Singer link animal suffering to human connection with other living beings. Singer defines suffering as inequality stating that most individuals believed