Personality Type Assessment

personalisedity theatrical role legal opinion (Week-2 Individual Assignment) CMGT/530 IT Organizational Behavior July 1, 2012 Personality character Assessment The first section of this paper details the elements that a constitution instance assessment typically measures. The siemens section contains discussion on the nature typesetters case assessment of the pen of this paper. In the third and last section, the author shargons how his personal assessment outcomes could affect his work relationships with his colleagues. Elements of Personality Type AssessmentA personality profile assessment is typically an fair game interrogatory where an individual gives yes or no responses to a series of systematic and deeply constructed lookal and situational questions. These objective questions at a funda kind level assesses the individuals cognitive psychic bring and orientations and based on the responses classifies the individual into one of the several personality types. separ ately of these personality types is associated with different sets of possible behaviors and unravelencies that the individuals are most likely to exhibit.This sorting of personality types is by a personality list framework called the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), created by Isabel Briggs Myers after extensive testing and research on the theory of psychological types introduced in the 1920s by Carl G. Jung. At the canonic level, the MBTI differentiates peoples cognitive functions in quaternion ways, as defined by quadruplet mutually exclusive corresponds of the dominant or likely mental preferences, and the combinations of these four pairs lead to a set of 16 personality types (MBTItoday. rg, n. d. ). The first pair of preferences, extr everyplacesion (E) and introversion (I), is for mental energy orientation. The extroverted individuals are expressive, assertive, outgoing, sociable, and take a crap their mental energy from the interactions with the immaterial world. The introverted individuals are reflective, reserved, quiet, and draw their mental energy from the dwelling in the inner world of thoughts and ideas (Center for Applications of mental Type, 2012).The second pair of preferences, sensing(S) and intuition (N), is for irrational mental cognitive process cogitate to perception and receipt of information. The individuals with dominant sensing perception live in the present moment and are practical. They prefer simplicity, clarity, routine, and order in their nonchalant lives. The individuals with dominant intuition perception are inspired by creativity and innovation, and imagine the possibilities for future. They are drawn to the big picture and abstract suppositional concepts (Center for Applications of mental Type, 2012).The third pair of preferences, mentation (T) and feeling (F), is for rational mental cognitive processes of forming judgments and making decisions. The individuals who primarily assert on their thinking for for ming judgments are objective, analytical, and logical. They use logic, reason, and cause-effect analysis to handle any problems and tasks they face for achieving results. The individuals who primarily verify on their feelings for forming judgments rely on their personal emotions and value system.They are interested about impact of their actions and decisions on other people (Center for Applications of Psychological Type, 2012). The one-quarter pair of preferences, judging (J) and perceiving (P), is for mental orientation while dealing with outside world. The individuals who prefer judging rely on the rational cognitive functions of thinking or feeling. They prefer the world around them to be structured, organized, and orderly. The individuals who prefer perceiving rely on the irrational cognitive functions of sensing and intuition.They typically are open, spontaneous, and compromising and look forward to experiencing the world in its natural state (Center for Applications of Psych ological Type, 2012). Personality Type Self-Assessment The author used Jung typology test to complete the ego assessment of his personal style and the results indicated that the writer belongs to personality type ISFP that mean the writer prefers introversion over extroversion, sensing over intuition, feeling over thinking, and perceiving over judging (HumanMetrics, 2012).The writer found himself pickings the assessment test few more times to confirm the derived results. According to personality inventory of MBTI and the Myers and Briggs Foundation (n. d. ), the individuals with personality type of ISFP have tendency to seek a peaceful, easygoing life with a live and let live philosophy. They tend to enjoy life as it comes and define their suffer pace. They tend to be quiet, caring, considerate, and have a pleasant demeanor. They tend to be very accustomed to their family and friends, and have a strong set of values that they cherish.They tend to disfavour conflicts, disagreeme nts, and imposing of their opinions on others (Myers and Briggs Foundation, n. d. a). After looking at the results, the writer dumb some of his own tendencies and consoled himself that he did not have to good at everything. He opined that the knowledge of these personality types can help in under genuine a deeper visualiseing of people around him. Also while taking the assessment, for some of the questions the writer was forced to choose yes or no when he believed the answer was neither, and there were no in-between options to choose from.So the writer agrees with Robbins &038 figure (2011) that the problem with these assessment tests is that they force a person into one type or another. According to Mccaulley (1990) every person uses all eight processes (E, I, S, N, T, F, J, and P) precisely intrinsically prefers one of each opposite pair. In the normal give of life, people develop preferences by doing what comes most naturally. As they grow old(a) and wiser, they develop as well as use more of the lesser preferred processes (Mccaulley, 1990).Reflecting back on his life, the writer agrees the personality type ISFP right on indicates his default tendencies. Moreover, the writer also believes that over the years he has developed more shades to his personality and has give out more balanced. Effect of Personal Assessment The assessment provided an opportunity for the writer to do some self-introspection and become more aware of self. Also the knowledge and understanding of 16 distinctive personality types helped the writer to appreciate others possessing different personality types.When employees can understand their type preferences, they can approach their work in a behavior that best suits their style, including managing their time, problem solving, best approaches to decision making, and dealing with stress (Myers and Briggs Foundation, n. d. b) . The writer could analyze better the good and not-so-good relations he has experienced with his forme r bosses and colleagues. The personality type assessment also helped the writer to reexamine his behavior with prior colleagues and identify the scope for improving relationships with his colleagues at the workplace.As a software package development manager in a leading health trouble organization, the writer will make use of the new understanding of his own personality to improve upon his managerial functions and his handling of the different situations. These functions includes managing others, developing leading skills, organizing tasks, creating teams, training for management as well as staff, conflict resolution, motivation, coaching, diversity, citation as well as rewards, and change management (Myers and Briggs Foundation, n. d. b) . References Center for Applications of Psychological Type. 2012). Mbti overview. Retrieved from http//www. capt. org/mbti-assessment/mbti-overview. htm HumanMetrics. (2012). Jung typology test. Retrieved from http//www. humanmetrics. com/cgi-w in/jtypes1. htm MBTItoday. org. (n. d. ). History of the myers briggs type indicator. Retrieved from http//mbtitoday. org/about-the-mbti-indicator/a-mini-history-of-the-myers-briggs-type-indicator/ Mccaulley, M. H. (1990). The myers-briggs type indicator a measure for individuals.. bar &038 Evaluation In Counseling &038 Development (American Counseling Association), 22(4), 181.Retrieved from https//search. ebscohost. com/login. aspx? direct= received&038db=f5h&038AN=9705111082&038site=eds-live Myers and Briggs Foundation. (n. d a). The 16 mbti types. Retrieved from http//www. myersbriggs. org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/the-16-mbti-types. aspISFP Myers and Briggs Foundation. (n. d. b). Mbti type at work. Retrieved from http//www. myersbriggs. org/type-use-for-everyday-life/mbti-type-at-work/ Robbins, S. P. , &038 Judge, T. A. (2011). Organization behavior (14th ed. ). New York, NY Prentice Hall.